Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1103920100160020147
Korean Journal of Hepatology
2010 Volume.16 No. 2 p.147 ~ p.157
Genotypic resistance to entecavir in chronic hepatitis B patients
Kim Byeong-Uk

Goo Ja-Chung
Park Byeong-Chool
Kim Soo-Ok
Hong Sun-Pyo
Jung Ji-In
Chae Hee-Bok
Park Seon-Mee
Youn Sei-Jin
Abstract
Background/Aims: The prevalence and clinical characteristics of entecavir (ETV) resistance is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of genotypic resistance in nonresponders and virologic breakthrough (VBT) patients.

Methods: The medical records of 76 chronic hepatitis B patients treated for a least 6 months from October 2006 to October 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided patients into two groups: nucleoside analogue (NA)-na?ve patients (n=38) and lAM experienced patients (n=38). NA-na?ve and lAM experienced patients received ETV at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/day, respectively. The virologic response and VBT were investigated in both groups. We used the multiplex restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) method to test genotypic resistance at the rtI169, rtT184, rtS202, rtM204, and rtM250 sites.
Results: Age, gender, serum AlT, and HBV DNA level before treatment did not differ between the groups. Neither VBT nor nonresponse was observed in the NA-na?ve group, whereas VBT and nonresponse were observed in three patients each in the lamivudine (lAM)-experienced group, all six patients had YMDD mutation at study enrollment, all three patients with VBT had genotypic resistance to ETV, but the three nonresponse patients did not have genotypic resistance to ETV.

Conclusions: We suspect that VBT is mostly associated with genotypic resistance to ETV. However, nonresponse might be associated with the continuance or reselection of the YMDD mutant in lAM-experienced patients.
KEYWORD
Entecavir, Virologic breakthrough, Non-response, Genotypic resistance
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø